To run Apple's software, you need an Apple computer.
APPLE IBOOKS AUTHOR WINDOWS PDF
Early reviews of the Apple software say their authoring tool's ui, its ease of importing assets such as keynote files, etc., are much more elegant than Windows word processors and pdf editors and yet is sufficiently powerful for the majority of users to produce an ebook. Again to fix formatting issues, the expectation is that you edit the pdf format code. Not free and Adobe's product is very expensive.
APPLE IBOOKS AUTHOR WINDOWS PROFESSIONAL
To edit formatting in PDF, users can go to Acrobat Professional or similar products. Is there a better word processor for handling formatting issues?īut at least windows programs can print to pdf. To create a decent looking epub using Word as a starting point is a world of hurt. Their implementation of "sections" is terrible. If it does not, how hard could this be given that MS Word format is based on xml? Pessimistically, I don't see Microsoft ever dedicating its resources to fixing the wysiwyg and unpredictable output issues. I haven't updated Word since 2003 so I don't know if it now allows saving to directly epub format. Images shift, text breaks in odd places, fonts in fields will change, formatting and page numbers in sections will change, etc. Word processors such as MS Word are not great at formatting longer documents and printing them to pdf often leads to unexpected formatting in the PDF. What would a comparable workflow be on a windows machine? So output is not as locked in as one would imagine for software that is free. It has a default format but includes support for other formats including pdf (I believe without the media)-not as desirable as standard epub, but not a horrible alternative. But you overstate when you say it supports only one output format. But it looks like only Apple is providing tools aimed at a general audience.Īpple always has an eye on supporting its hardware sales. The learning curve is prohibitive.Īpple recognizes there is a use for targetted ebooks, whether for a classroom, business training, church groups, etc.
InDesign would really be overkill for most teachers and business people. The innovation that Apple appears to be making with their new tool is that it's a tool that does not require a degree in design to produce nice output and with media support to boot (in its proprietary format). I have InDesign and its workflow is akin to the old Pagemaker or Quark.
0 kommentar(er)
